On 10 May 2013 18:40, Adrian Custer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/10/13 12:25 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: >> Adrian Custer wrote: >>> On 5/9/13 2:33 PM, Tim Bowden wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 13:20 -0300, Adrian Custer wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey Cameron, all, >>>>> >>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> * The letter is only rejection of the proposal without offering an >>>>> alternative way forwards. >>>> >>>> >>>> I strongly suspect the proposed standard would have received a much >>>> better reception from the broader OSGeo community (with the diverse >>>> viewpoints it typically has) if the proposal was more that a "take it or >>>> leave it" (partial?) description of what ESRI has done and is going to >>>> do anyway. >> >> >> Out of curiosity, how does this compare to the process by which KML >> became an OGC standard? > > > That was the first really contentious issue I experienced at the OGC. It is > related to the current situation in that the KML experience seems to have > encouraged ERSI to try to push GeoServices through.
Indeed. The whole discussion is more like a cry over spilled milk. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
