I agree that with some love, OSGeo4W has the potential to be an excellent asset to the OSGeo community.

It also shares many synergies with OSGeo-Live, and I could see many opportunities for the two projects to benefit each other.

For instance, the OSGeo-Live Project Overviews could be extended to include references to OSGeo4W. We could also align OSGeo-Live/OSGeo4W releases and marketing pipeline (based around the FOSS4G calendar).

From what I can gather from the outside, it seems osgeo4w's primary requirement is a 1+ dedicated developer(s) who will drive the core functions of the project. Namely, setting a release schedule, chasing developers for contributions, triaging bug lists, etc. This can be done with or without a PSC or official OSGeo endorsement.

On 21/09/13 07:52, Alex Mandel wrote:
On 09/20/2013 02:45 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
2013/9/20 Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it>

I suggest to make a Steering Committee
for OSGEO4W, so to have a clear roadmap, and give Windows (urgh!)
users a predictable environment. I think some of our million users
would be happy to support this effort, if they would know they
contribute actively to something they need.


Hi Paolo,

I agree with you entrirely, as we've already been talking about this today.
Being committed to provide usable binaries on Windows, you can count me in.
Setting up a build environment (probably a version of a Windows Server x64
edition with MSVC2010 for instance) providing to compile all the stuff at
the same place would be a prerequisite.


Best regards,

Tamas

I'm actually already providing such an instance and was planning to
clone it to several instances as well as a testing instance.
Frank has the keys to drive it and has been using it for several months
already.

It's part of my lab's participation in the ICA-OSGeo initiative.
http://geospatial.ucdavis.edu/resources/open-source

Thanks,
Alex

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to