Fair enough, will ask there. Cheers, Andrea
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Howard Butler <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2013, at 2:38 AM, andrea antonello <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, I hope this is not OT. >> I wanted to ask a short advice on a las file content problem. >> >> I wanted to get a short comment about how GPS Week Time is seen in the >> las format. >> >> Let's assume the las file format is prior to 1.2, so no encoding >> information is available to open possibility for adjusted gps time. >> >> In that case, is it so that the Gps Week Time is just the seconds in >> the week, without any information about the week? >> I was under the assumption that the format of GPS Week Time would be >> "week.time" as content of the double, hence giving a full timestamp >> information. >> >> I can't find a document exactly specifying this, the las specs just >> state: "GPS Time: The GPS time is the double floating point time tag >> value at which the point was acquired." >> >> It is interesting, since I often found the header's date not being >> accurate (and seems to reflect the file modification date), making it >> impossible for me to define a unique timestamp. >> >> Thanks for any comment, or link to docs. > > This item is quite off-topic for this mailing list. I suggest emailing the > following google group for access to more LAS implementors and knowledgable > folks. > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/lasroom > > Howard > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
