On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 10:20:01 -0800 Darrell Fuhriman <[email protected]> wrote:
> The Cookbook, Lessons Learned, and the recent 2013 summary have > been the most valuable for us. > > The archive may have some value as a historical artifact, but that > kind of higher level stuff is far more valuable. The day to day > discussion threads simply do not matter. I agree, the summaries are more readable and easy to navigate than the raw logs of all discussions. Of course, as soon as they will be available, they can be consulted if more detail is needed, so I am in favour of keeping them archived in a convenient format. Thanks Steven and LOC for working on that. > And I'm with Steven, wikis suck as a project management tool. At best > they're good as somewhat organized record of what was done (e.g. > meeting notes). For actually getting work done, there are far better > tools out there. Same from me. If you find a valuable tool and wish to have an OSGeo instance of it, let Board/SAC know. > Darrell Best, Anne > On Dec 5, 2013, at 03:04, Steven Feldman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Jeff > > > > You have raised the topic of our use of basecamp several times. I > > believe the LOC has the right and the need to choose the internal > > comms tool that works best for it. We chose basecamp and it worked > > well for us, much much better than dysfunctional mailing lists or a > > wiki. Those who follow on can make their own choices. > > > > Re the archiving of logo file, discussions etc. We have committed > > to doing this and will deliver in a way that may be useful to > > others although I doubt that Portland or anyone following will ever > > look at this stuff, I know we never looked in the SVN at previous > > years' archives > -- http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Aghisla
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
