Possible reasons for change: Inclusiveness Democracy Growth Openness ______ Steven
On 26 Jun 2014, at 17:21, Michael P. Gerlek <[email protected]> wrote: > Correct: “membership”, by design at the original founding meeting, was > designed not to confer ANY rights or distinguishing properties except for the > ability to vote for board members. > > While the election process is pretty messy right now, I view that as a > solvable problem: I’m still at a loss to understand why we’d want to change > anything more than that. > > -mpg > > > > On Jun 26, 2014, at 2:58 AM, Steven Feldman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If I have understood this procedure correctly: >> >> The board is voted for by the Charter Members, new Charter Members are >> proposed and voted for by the existing Charter Members, there may be a limit >> placed on the number of new Charter Members set by the board. >> >> Membership of OSGeo does not seem to confer any rights on the member. >> >> Do we need to review our foundation docs to find a more inclusive procedure? >> ____________ >> Steven Feldman >> >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
