Kind of wish people were thee for Alex's talk on OsGeo live metrics. We don't need to guess on the value of of local events - Alex has the numbers to show why local conferences are amazing - they motivate more downloads.
I also had a talk on OSGeo as a software foundation - thanks to those who attended. These meta-talks were tricky to schedule in a conference where the value comes from using software. > On Sep 18, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Jachym Cepicky <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > great mails after FOSS4G. I wish, we had chance to talk about stuff > openly face2face on FOSS4G, but there was no timeslot, nor members > (not so many). > > If you agree, I (any help welcomed) volunteer for creating > questionnaire (using google forms) with questions to our charter > members. The results should be: > > * review of OSGeo goals as described on [1] > * feedback from local chapters, why they need OSGeo > * feedback from projects, future projects - why did they want to be > osgeo project, why do they still want to remain osgeo project, why > there are not so many new osgeo projects > * feedback from members: why are you member, what are you expecting from osgeo > * ... others ... > > Someone else might put it into mail in more structured way. > > Any agreement? Co-volunteer? Good idea? Absolutely bad idea? > > Jachym > > > [1] http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/about.html > > -- > Jachym Cepicky > e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com > URL: http://les-ejk.cz > GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp > > Give your code freedom with PyWPS - http://pywps.wald.intevation.org > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
