On 09/25/2014 06:53 AM, Jo Cook wrote: > Dear List, > > A while ago I reached out to the tilecache mailing list to try and > understand what's happening with the project. The company that I work for > has a few minor fixes that we would like to contribute back to the main > code, and I also noticed that there are some broken links on the website > (and in the example config) as the metacarta tile server is no longer in > operation, so beginners are going to find it quite tough to set up. A quick > look on github suggests a number of people have forked it and are doing > their own thing, but ideally it would be good to know if the core team are > still doing any work on it, or have any plans to take it forward. Github's > great, but it would also be nice to have a canonical version of the package > that we can all contribute to rather than many versions, all slightly > different. > > As I said, I asked this question on the tilecache mailing list and got no > answer, so I thought I'd ask here but if anyone wants to chat about it off > list then please do get in touch. > > All the best > > Jo > >
Apparently it's been lurking quietly. There were only 3 people with commit access to the svn, which has been up all this time, just unknown since the trac instance was down (spammed to death). Today I helped Brian resurrect it's public face, website in progress, but code as it stands is now available on github in anticipation of merges, pull requests and contributors. https://github.com/OSGeo/tilecache To all those with forks, it would be great to bring it all back together if possible - or at least make it easier to figure out what's different between the forks. Thanks, Alex OSGeo Sys Admin Committee _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss