Henrique Your opening words encapsulate a problem for me (at least) “my system” - this is an open source community.
______ Steven > On 27 Jul 2015, at 20:00, [email protected] wrote: > > From: "Munich Orientation Convention" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Location codes - best standard3all > Date: 27 July 2015 11:50:07 BST > To: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > Hi Jonathan, > > my system isn’t easy to understand if you try to understand all 25 benefits > at once. > Let’s describe only the location code benefit: the codes consist on hours, > minutes and radius, nothing else. It was made for children, so please try to > think like a child. > > Instead of molesting your customers with an address like: > > Howbery Park, Wallingford Oxfordshire, OX10 8BA, > > you could indicate this: www.volksnav.de/HRwallingford > <http://www.volksnav.de/HRwallingford> > > 193 blocks of houses from Oxford Carfax tower in direction m4, > respectively 93 blocks later than m4. > > The width of a sector is radius/2 (!), so you’re close to the sector m5. > > Besides: VolksNav is something like the military ro-theta navigation. > > Henrique
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
