Hello community, here is another real case that I would like to raise.
rasdaman [0] is listed on OpenHub [1], like many of us, with owner rasdaman GmbH set originally. By coincidence I found that OSGeo has claimed rasdaman at some time in the past. To my total surprise, as rasdaman is in incubation since about 5 years now [2], and since quite some time OSGeo refuses graduation requiring this and that extra documentation. I find this undercover misappropriation a gross violation of professional ethics and request to immediately "give back" the project as a remedial action. I could do it myself, but recently OpenHub requires a phone number to be entered to which, as blog comments show, spam will get sent. IMO it is on OSGeo to bring this sacrifice. Actually, I know who has "stolen ownership", but will not disclose identity publicly following suggested practice. Rather, I am seeking contact to and investigation by the CoC Committee (or whoever is in charge). Thanks, Peter [0] http://www.rasdaman.org [1] https://www.openhub.net/p/rasdaman [2] http://rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeo PS: On the side, this IMHO justifies an amendment of the CoC rules to prevent such a case in future. -- Dr. Peter Baumann - Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann mail: [email protected] tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178 - Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793) www.rasdaman.com, mail: [email protected] tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882 "Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083) _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
