A few data points:

* The OSGeo board has existed for nine years, with nine members each year, for 
a total of 81 positions. Except one year had an unfilled slot, so it’s actually 
80.

* 33 different people have served on the board.

* The distribution of how-many-people served-for-N-years looks like this:

        1 year: 6 people
        2 years: 18 people
        3 years: 3 people
        4 years: 1 person
        5 years: 1 person
        6 years: 2 people
        7 years: 0 people
        8 years: 1 person

* Only 1 person has ever served non-consecutive terms.

* There does not appear to be any statistically meaningful change in 
average-length-of-term over the nine years.

* With 8 consecutive years of service, Frank holds the coveted OSGeo "Mr. 
Popularity" award.


For extra credit:
        - has the "geographic diversity” changed over the year?
        - what does the board chair (president) representation over time look 
like?
        - weight the board members by the % of meetings they attended: what can 
be learned?
        - weight the board members by the ratio of +1/-1 votes: who is the 
most… umm… “unharmonious”?


(data taken from http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_of_Directors)

-mpg




> On Sep 23, 2015, at 3:17 AM, Gert-Jan van der Weijden <gert-...@osgeo.nl> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hello list,
> 
> Preparing to cast my vote for the board election, I noticed that all 4 
> (Jáchym, Bart, Gérald, Jorge) board members who reached the end of their 
> 2-year term are not standing for re-election. (besides that: Anne decided not 
> to stay for her 2nd year of her 1st term)
> 
> Some questions arise:
> - Is the board membership such a demanding job that members always resign 
> after 2 years?
> - Is this a good thing, to make sure we dont'have board members who are tied 
> to their seats?
> - Or is this a bad thing, with board members switching too fast to reach 
> their goals?
> 
> Respones from anybody are as always appreciated, but the 4+1 resigning board 
> members and the current candidates are especially invited to give their 
> humble opinion on this.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Gert-Jan
> 
> 
> Gert-Jan van der Weijden
> Voorzitter Stichting OSGeo.nl
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to