All, Fun thread to follow. throwing my thoughts out . . .
I think the bigger issue is the word “change” in the discussions. It’s not about changing anything. It’s about classifying items better than before. Nothing is going away label-wise, or really being changed either. For example, you can say we’re putting on a OSGeo conference, and you can say, that is a FOSS4G project. I wouldn’t anticipate either of these labels going by the way side any time soon, but rather the desire being there for them to be used more specifically than they were before. +1 to modify usage of terms. bobb > On Oct 7, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Marc Peterson <marc.peter...@gmx.net> wrote: > > >> From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss- >> boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Barry Rowlingson > >> Yes, you and I and everyone *on this mailing list* knows >> the difference and the relationship between OSGeo and FOSS4G. But >> there are people out there in geospatial who don't know either. > > Emphatic +1 > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
