All, The OGC is moving forward in our efforts for Point Cloud standardization. As presented at our most recent meeting in Sydney, Australia, the Point Cloud DWG will be releasing a survey to the interested community as a whole (not just OGC membership) to identify the most pressing requirements for standardization in the Point Cloud domain and also to seek interest from parties to participate in such standardization activities. Please stay tuned for the survey - we will be sure to copy these OSGeo lists once the survey is available.
Of course, all discussion and all work will be performed on a consensus basis in accordance to our Principles of Conduct. We will judge our work on its merit and not denigrate any pre-existing or submitted efforts. Thanks and Regards, Scott Scott Simmons Executive Director, Standards Program Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) tel +1 970 682 1922 mob +1 970 214 9467 ssimm...@opengeospatial.org <mailto:ssimm...@opengeospatial.org> The OGC: Making Location Count… www.opengeospatial.org <http://www.opengeospatial.org/> > On Dec 22, 2015, at 1:59 PM, Suchith Anand <suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk> > wrote: > > Hi Cameron, > > I fully agree that everyone should respect the OSGeo code of conduct and be > respectful in the way the facts are presented. > > I think OSGeo have done our job of highlighting the importance of standards > in LiDAR data formats through our open letter in May 2015. OGC have set up a > process and it is ongoing, so i request everyone to be patient. You are > right, OSGeo Board is only a few volunteers, representing a large body of > volunteers, so we should not overburden them with additional loads. > > It is now for OGC colleagues to continue to guide the process forward and i > request everyone to work together step by step for this. It is important to > be patient , listen to all viewpoints and slowly build consensus. I hope all > stakeholders will work together in the common objective of Open Standards in > LiDAR for the benefit of the wider geo community. > > Best wishes, > > Suchith > > > > From: Cameron Shorter [cameron.shor...@gmail.com > <mailto:cameron.shor...@gmail.com>] > Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 8:27 PM > To: Carl Reed; Suchith Anand > Cc: discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>; > ica-osgeo-l...@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:ica-osgeo-l...@lists.osgeo.org> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Ica-osgeo-labs] Do you remember this? > > Hi Suchith, Sergio, Micha, > > Thanks Carl for highlighting the importance of mutual respect. OSGeo also has > a Code-Of-Conduct [1] with similar sentiment to OGC: > > We strive to ... > Be careful in the words that we choose. > Whether we are participating as professionals or volunteers, we value > professionalism in all interactions, and take responsibility for our own > speech. Be kind to others. Do not insult or put down other participants. > > The content of the text being referenced is pushing the boundaries of our > Code of Conduct [1] by making fun of another organisation. > > I suggest that we wish to raise this point with the OGC, then reword, > focusing just on the facts, and ideally be respectful in the way the facts > are presented. > > Hi Suchith, > I suggest being careful to not over-promise what OSGeo will do (in this case > responding to a letter), unless you are volunteering to do it yourself on > behalf of OSGeo. The OSGeo Board is only a few volunteers, representing a > large body of volunteers. We can do much, but we do it as volunteers. > > Warm regards, Cameron > > [1] http://www.osgeo.org/code_of_conduct > <http://www.osgeo.org/code_of_conduct> > > On 23/12/2015 6:27 am, Carl Reed wrote: >> All - >> >> The OGC has a formal Principals of Conduct Policy. I wrote and maintained >> the policy with the agreement and approval of the OGC membership. >> >> http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/policies/conduct >> <http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/policies/conduct> >> >> This policy was initially based on the IETF conduct policy. >> >> Please read sections 3.a and 3.b as they have to do with how OGC members >> interact with one another as well as with the broader community. >> >> So before "stirring the pot" on the LiDAR topic again, consider the Conduct >> policy as guidance on consensus building. >> >> Happy Holidays >> >> Carl >> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Suchith Anand >> <suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk>> >> wrote: >> Hi Sergio, Micha, >> >> Thank you for bringing this to our attention. >> >> The OSGeo Foundation will respond formally to this in due course as we had >> initiated this open letter for the need for standards in LiDAR data formats >> [1], [2]. I request OSGeo Board to add this in the agenda of the next Board >> meeting and also for the F2F meeting, so we can discuss and plan next steps. >> >> But first we will wait for response from the Open Geospatial Consortium - >> who as per their website is committed to making quality open standards for >> the global geospatial community and have been working on this by setting up >> a Point Cloud DWG. We have put our trust in OGC in this process , so let us >> first get the response from OGC. I am ccing Scott Simmons of OGC to get >> their response. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Suchith >> >> >> [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/LIDAR_Format_Letter >> <http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/LIDAR_Format_Letter> >> [2] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-May/014222.html >> <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-May/014222.html> >> >> >> From: ica-osgeo-labs [ica-osgeo-labs-boun...@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:ica-osgeo-labs-boun...@lists.osgeo.org>] on behalf of Micha Silver [ >> <mailto:mi...@arava.co.il>mi...@arava.co.il <mailto:mi...@arava.co.il>] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 1:55 PM >> To: SERGIO ACOSTAYLARA; >> <mailto:ica-osgeo-l...@lists.osgeo.org>ica-osgeo-l...@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:ica-osgeo-l...@lists.osgeo.org>; discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org> >> Subject: Re: [Ica-osgeo-labs] [OSGeo-Discuss] Do you remember this? >> >> Here's the continuation: >> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/standards/2015-December/000960.html >> <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/standards/2015-December/000960.html> >> >> On 12/22/2015 03:45 PM, SERGIO ACOSTAYLARA wrote: >>> I remember discussing this in April: "Open Letter for the need for Open >>> Standards in LiDAR"; now I found this interesting post: >>> <http://rapidlasso.com/2015/12/19/the-darc-force-awakens-esri-escalates-lidar-format-war/>http://rapidlasso.com/2015/12/19/the-darc-force-awakens-esri-escalates-lidar-format-war/ >>> >>> <http://rapidlasso.com/2015/12/19/the-darc-force-awakens-esri-escalates-lidar-format-war/> >>> >>> Is the empire striking back? >>> >>> >>> >>> Sergio Acosta y Lara >>> Departamento de Geomática >>> Dirección Nacional de Topografía >>> Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Públicas >>> URUGUAY >>> >>> >>> This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss> >>> This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System. >> >> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee >> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this >> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. >> >> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this >> message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the >> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the >> University of Nottingham. >> >> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an >> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your >> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email >> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as >> permitted by UK legislation. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss> >> >> >> >> -- >> Carl Reed, PhD >> Carl Reed and Associates >> >> Mobile: 970-402-0284 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss> > -- > Cameron Shorter, > Software and Data Solutions Manager > LISAsoft > Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf, > 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009 > > P +61 2 9009 5000, W www.lisasoft.com <http://www.lisasoft.com/>, F +61 2 > 9009 5099 > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this > message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. > > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this > message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the > author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the > University of Nottingham. > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an > attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your > computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as > permitted by UK legislation. > _______________________________________________ > ica-osgeo-labs mailing list > ica-osgeo-l...@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:ica-osgeo-l...@lists.osgeo.org> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ica-osgeo-labs > <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ica-osgeo-labs>
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
