I would ask if the project would consider joining OSGeo as a community project <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Community_Projects>? This requirement is minimal, we want some assurance that your project is both open source and open to collaboration.
Alex - are their any other projects we provide infrastructure for that we can extend an invitation to? -- Jody Garnett On 2 May 2016 at 10:00, Alex M <tech_...@wildintellect.com> wrote: > On 05/02/2016 02:36 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > > Hi all, > > this mail is to request permission to use the download area > > of OSGeo for publishing librttopo packages, and possibly > > an rttopo.osgeo.org domain and webspace. > > > > The librttopo project consists of a GPL(v2+) licensed library > > providing a standard-based topology API on top of user-provided > > input/output routines for storage. It was derived from the PostGIS > > liblwgeom library at its 2.2.0 version, from which deviated to > > drop PostGIS-specific dependencies and add thread-safety (not > > of interest for PostGIS proper at this time). > > > > The upcoming 4.4.0 version of Spatialite will be using librttopo > > instead of liblwgeom and the aim is to attract other liblwgeom users > > (QGIS, for example) so to eventually free PostGIS from the burden of > > maintaining a stable liblwgeom API. Having PostGIS itself use > > librttopo is currently not on the radar, but might be considered in > > the future if librttopo gets more development. > > > > At the moment librttopo code is hosted in the experimental OSGeo > > [Gogs service](https://git.osgeo.org/gogs/rttopo/librttopo) and > > has an OSGeo hosted [mailing list] > > (https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/librttopo-dev) > > > > The project is managed by Andrea Peri of "Regione Toscana" (primary > > sponsor for the library), Alessandro Furieri of Spatialite and > > myself from PostGIS/GEOS. > > > > Some more background info are available from [my website] > > (https://strk.kbt.io/projects/rttopo) > > > > --strk; > > > This seems to be a reasonable request from a project that is likely > participate widely in the OSGeo community (note we already provided > email and a git repo). > > +1 > > Thanks, > Alex > Sys Admin Committee > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss