Hello everyone, First of all, I'm a bit disappointed that this issue is only raised now, when the final vote for graduating is taking place. For the future I think it should be clearer for projects what rules have to be obliged much earlier.
Just this week, in another conversation I mentioned that you need rules for when things go bad, and not when things are going well (which luckily is the case for Rasdaman). So I think we should focus on what resolution we want when things "go bad". It may be my knowledge of English, but I'm not sure how I should understand: "Should such consent exceptionally not be reached then Peter Baumann has a casting vote". If it means that if the PSC reaches 50% - 50% or a lot of abstintent voting, Peter can take the decision, then I think it is a logical rule and I see no issues with it. If it means that if a majority of the PSC votes for the proposal that it can still be overruled by Peter Baumann (or the chair of the PSC), then I'm against it. I do believe that would be an unlikely scenario but at such a time I don't think we can still call it an OSGeo project at that point. Kind Regards, Johan _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss