Hi Paolo, Markus, Tom and Till, You have provided some good links there that will be sufficient for my immediate need.
Many thanks for your help. @Markus, Your spreadsheet comparison shows a lot of potential, but I can see that it will take a lot of effort to keep it current. Is this something that projects are doing currently? Bruce On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Bruce Bannerman <b.banner...@bom.gov.au> wrote: > > > On 13/05/2016, 16:08, "Discuss on behalf of Paolo Cavallini" > <discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org on behalf of cavall...@faunalia.it> > wrote: > > >Il 12/05/2016 23:57, Bruce Bannerman ha scritto: > >> Has anyone done a recent comparison of desktop GIS and image processing > >> capability? > >> > >> It would be interesting to see where we stand now with FOSS4G software > >> functionality. > >> > >> It appears that this is what ESRI is using to compare the functionality > >> of their various license levels: > >> > >> > >> > https://esriaustralia.com.au/u/lib/cms/arcgis1021-desktop-functionality-m > >>atrix.pdf > >> > >> Is there something comparable (that also refers to additional capability > >> that is offered via OS? > > > >Hi Bruce, > >previous attempts proved difficult, as a proper comparison involves a > >lot of work. The ESRI document seems a good starting point. Unsure we > >would be allowed to reuse it. > >Would you be willing to help filling up the table for some free GIS? > >All the best. > > > >-- > >Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > >QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html > >_______________________________________________ > >Discuss mailing list > >Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > >http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss