Hi Suchith,
The only real way to limit the use of the word Open would be to register it as 
a trademark. To the best of my knowledge, none of the big Open Source 
initiatives have done this which would suggest it's not a good idea for some 
reason. Apparently someone tried to trademark "Open Source Hardware" but was 
rejected: https://opensource.com/law/13/5/os-hardware-trademark-rejected

The other option, in the UK at least, is if an advertisement claimed to be Open 
but the thing wasn't, you could always raise a complaint with the Advertising 
Standard Agency, but I believe they're fairly toothless....

As to "business ethics" - that's a clearcut oxymoron if ever I've seen one.

Cheers,
Jonathan


---- On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:17:40 +0000 Suchith 
Anand<[email protected]> wrote ---- 

My query was if the term Open can be used for marketing any properitery 
softwares and platforms and to know if there are any guidelines on this? This 
definition Ravi Kumar send is helpful to help me understand one aspect of this 
. Thanks Ravi Kumar.

Best wishes,

Suchith
________________________________________
From: Jody Garnett <[email protected]>
Sent: 25 March 2017 7:21 AM
To: Ravi Kumar; Anand Suchith
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to 
market thier properitery product as Open ?

And here is the biz model definition, I would be interested if the original 
poster can clarify in which context the word was used :)
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:55 PM Ravi Kumar 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:
This is a good thread, and let us discuss to derive a 'Note', for those facing 
'Questions', evangelising Free and Open GIS.

I suggest this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_platform for many who wish to 
know.
May be we can have a page on, 'OSGeo Wiki' on this topic.
Cheers
Ravi Kumar


On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Suchith Anand 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:

Hi all,


I have a query. If a properitery GIS vendor starts marketing thier properitery 
products as Open platform and software then what rights do the organisations 
and customers have who are mislead buying the properitery software thinking it 
is open have ? The definision of Proprietary software [1] is very clearly 
defined, so how can it be possible for any properitery GIS vendor to market 
their software knowingly as open platform if it is properitery?


This also greatly affects the business and revenues of true open source 
software companies . Who is responsible for any misleading marketing that 
results in losses to both customers who are mislead to buy the properitery 
software thinking it is open and also to other companies who do true open 
source business who lose out on the business opportunities? Is it right 
business ethics to do this?


Best wishes,

Suchith


[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_software



This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.


_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
--
Jody Garnett




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss




_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to