Hi,

I also agree with Maxi.

I think the point we have to care about is that OSGeo is visible
prominently on the F4G-conference-website and also during the
conference. We put a strong focus on OSGeo-presence in 2016.

Till



Am 03.07.2017 um 09:17 schrieb andrea antonello:
> Hi all,
> I completely agree with Massimiliano. There is a huge difference
> between host and sponsor.
>
> That said, I understand Brad's points and also would never want for
> this to end in additional costs.
>
> But this should be considered as something to keep well in mind.
>
> Regards,
> Andrea
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Puneet Kishor <[email protected]> wrote:
>> As a (nominal) Charter Member, I personally couldn't care about this issue. 
>> As long as everyone involved is for the same higher purpose, who is 
>> sponsoring who or supporting what is just details. Move on and focus on the 
>> bigger tasks.
>>
>>> On Jul 2, 2017, at 5:47 PM, Brad Hards <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Professor Cannata,
>>>
>>>> Your answer clarifies that OSGeo has not paid for being listed as sponsor.
>>>>
>>>> This doesn't change my idea that OSGeo shouldn't be listed as a sponsor an
>>>> thus
>>>>
>>>> I renew my request to the board for removing OSGeo from that list and from
>>>> any material listing OSGeo together (at the same level and/or same list of
>>>> sponsors).
>>>>
>>>> That's because the marketing message it brings is clearly undesired and not
>>>> respectful of the true.
>>> I'm not a charter member or associated with the FOSS4G organisers, but 
>>> having
>>> attended a FOSS4G event and having been part of a volunteer conference
>>> organisation, I respectfully ask that you reconsider. This is a very late
>>> change to a lot of conference materials, and at a particularly bad time for
>>> the organisers.
>>>
>>> In software terms, I'm not suggesting that your proposal isn't a valid 
>>> change,
>>> just that it is too late in the release cycle.
>>>
>>> If nothing else, consider the environmental impact of all that stuff being
>>> junked.
>>>
>>> Brad
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to