Dear OSGeo Board,

On the 20th of February I wrote in response to a concern raised on LGBT+ 
concerns in Dar es Salaam. To this, set out the following four action points:

To help move forward on this, we will 1. Ensure that we provide guidance to 
those in our community on this issue; 2. Seek dialog within our community on 
this issue, I am personally contactable on this and fully welcome any and all 
people who wish to discuss this on a face-to-face (over VC) or any other medium 
that the community would feel better with; 3. Recommend that the board puts in 
place guidance for future OSGEO conferences other this issues; 4. Support the 
formation of an LGBT+ grouping within OSGEO to better support appropriate 
guidance on this issue.

To update on this:

1. We are collaborating with Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team on this issue, to 
ensure that the response to our mutual communities are in lock-step on this 
issue. Guidance will be published for consultation for the conference shortly;
2. I have reached out to members of the LGBT+ community that I know personally 
on a bilateral basis. I would welcome further dialogue with the OSGeo LGBT+ 
community on a bilateral, private basis for people to voice their concerns in 

Points 3 and 4 are of specific interest, in the view of the LOC of FOSS4G 2018, 
as we can set policy direction for our conference, but have no mandate nor 
mechanism to set policy across OSGeo. To this end, I would formally request, in 
my role of Chair of FOSS4G for the OSGeo Board to provide direction to future 
FOSS4G conferences and to further support and service this community within our 
wider community. 

Clearly, there is a desire for LGBT+ to be considered further in our community 
- as noted in the transcript of the previous board meeting [1], but I think 
this needs to be communicated to our wider community - I see the discussions on 
the OSGeo board mailing list, though this may not have the widest circulation. 
I am also available to have a video conference with the board, at their 
earliest possible convenience if such an invitation was extended.

Finally, I really want to stress this for our conference in Dar es Salaam this 
year to our community: We want to have the most inclusive conference that we 
can possibly have. In the same way that previous FOSS4G events in Boston and 
North Carolina have demonstrated, our conferences have dealt with challenges 
within the wider legislative framework of their host country, we as a community 
are welcoming to any and all with open arms. We will publish guidance for those 
travelling, and if you still wish to participate but cannot come to Dar es 
Salaam, get in touch with us - we will help you get involved! Our FOSS4G will 
only be successful due to ALL the people in our OSGeo community; we are a big 
and dynamic family - we will reflect and live that this year in Dar es Salaam, 
and I hope in the many years to come.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: jorge.dejesus < <>>
Date: 21 February 2018 at 08:26
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] LGBT in Tanzania
To: <>

Hi to all

I was following the LGBT  in Tanzania discussion, and I am happy to see the 
question added to the next RfP.

The discussion on LGBT rights and safety requires a bit of common sense, I am 
LGBT it is one part of my live as being OsGEO member is another (one of many) 
part(s), normally these two don't intercept much, personally I think  this is  
why the LGBT community is present in OsGEO but very invisible. What?? No LGBT 
birds of the feather in FOSS4G ???

Having a code of conduct that is non discriminatory, we must take  into 
consideration the rights of minorities and safety of ALL the participants of 
and a OsGEO conference, the LOC have to do their best for the safety.  LOC 
should also informed  participants on what  are the real  problems that 
participants may have to face, then is up to the participants to decide if they 
fell comfortable to to attend the conference.

Again, nice to see this topic discussed and remember these comments are my 2 

Enjoy your day

On 21-02-18 10:30, Till Adams wrote:
> Darrell, @ohers,
> thanks for the sum up, I agree in including such a question in the next
> RfP. In order to preserve your proposal, I've added your questionTill here:
> <>
> I will add this to the next RfP-text.
> Till
> Am 20.02.2018 um 18:32 schrieb Darrell Fuhriman:
>> "FOSS4G attracts a global, diverse community. Are there any laws, or
>> social norms, in your proposed location that would make members of our
>> community feel unsafe or unwelcome? That could include, but is not
>> limited to, anti-LGBTQ+ policies, policies that would prevent the free
>> exercise of religion, restrictions on certain activities based on
>> gender or other factor, etc?”
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> <>
> <>

Conference_dev mailing list <> 

Discuss mailing list

Reply via email to