Thanks Adam.

We have a lot to do to get the best out of our relationship with OGC so that it 
is a more win/win situation for both communities.

Therefore, do not worry too much about wading through past archives.

I’m much more interested in what we can do moving forward.

Kind regards,

Bruce

> On 21 Feb 2019, at 23:27, adam steer <adam.d.st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bruce, all
> 
> In the interests of open-ness that person is me - I’d like to look over the 
> standards list archive for a couple of days before officially tossing my hat 
> into the ring if that’s allright. My contact so far with OGC is primarily in 
> the point cloud DWG; and in a former life a couple of years working for an 
> OGC member organisation delivering training/internal advice on what OGC web 
> data services meant with respect to climate/EO data (WMS/WCS/WFS/WPS). There 
> is a whole lot I *don’t* know, in particular about how OSGeo interacts with 
> OGC (hence a discovery mission to do)
> 
> Regards
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> 
>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 22:42, Bruce Bannerman 
>> <bruce.bannerman.os...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I’ve had one more expression of interest, off list.
>> 
>> I’ve asked the person to submit it to this list over the next few days.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Bruce
>> 
>>> On 21 Feb 2019, at 18:31, Suchith Anand <suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> May I also request that  OSGeo representatives who take up these slots to 
>>> please also take some time to share OSGeo events updates and information in 
>>> the OGC maillists to help build wider collaborations/synergies. As part of  
>>> the OSGeo-OGC MoU , they can share key OSGeo events (FOSS4G conferences 
>>> etc) to the OGC maillists etc. So please respond to this call for 
>>> volunteers request if you are interested. Thanks.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best wishes,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Suchith
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: Discuss <discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Cameron 
>>> Shorter <cameron.shor...@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: 20 February 2019 19:37
>>> To: standa...@lists.osgeo.org; OSGeo Discussions
>>> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Standards] Spare OGC membership slot
>>>  
>>> I'm looping Scott's comments (from the OGC) into the general OGC discussion 
>>> forum, as I think there are others who might be interested.
>>> 
>>> I'll add that you should plan to dedicate a lot of time if you intend to 
>>> partake in OGC initiatives. The OGC tackles hard interoperability problems 
>>> and you will likely need to think and discuss deeply with like minded 
>>> people. It is hard work, but it can be very satisfying and rewarding to be 
>>> working on the bleeding edge of technology (as many open source developers 
>>> are doing already).
>>> 
>>> Warm regards, Cameron
>>> 
>>>> On 19/2/19 7:52 pm, Scott Serich wrote:
>>>> Hi Jonathan (and anybody else listening). Something that might be 
>>>> attractive to providers of open-source offerings is the opportunity to 
>>>> participate in OGC testbeds and other initiatives. Any OGC member who's 
>>>> interested might consider the following:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Sign up as an Observer for the OGC Testbed-15 initiative to learn how 
>>>> they work.
>>>> 2. Plan on submitting a bid in early 2020 to implement new offerings as 
>>>> part of OGC Testbed-16.
>>>> 3. Selected bidders will become participants to receive cost-share funds 
>>>> to help offset the cost of developing testbed component implementations.
>>>> 4. These participants will retain full control over the source code 
>>>> assets. All that must be delivered are interoperability demonstrations 
>>>> showing how the work helps advance the OGC standards baseline.
>>>> 
>>>> Under current testbed policies, OGC does not take possession of any of the 
>>>> developed source code. So in some sense, this is a roundabout way to get 
>>>> "paid" to develop open-source code. It's generally not sufficient funds to 
>>>> enable full cost recovery. But if the alternative is to receive no funding 
>>>> at all, this might present an attractive option.
>>>> 
>>>> Contact me or visit 
>>>> "https://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/initiatives/active"; if you're 
>>>> interested in learning more. Full observer privileges are available to all 
>>>> OGC members (including the OSGeo slot).
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> -Scott
>>>> 
>>>> =====
>>>> Scott Serich, Ph.D., JD
>>>> Director, Innovation Programs, Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
>>>> +1 (703) 283-3432
>>>> sser...@opengeospatial.org
>>>> Skype: scott.serich.ogc
>>>> The OGC: Making Location Count.
>>>> www.opengeospatial.org 
>>>> =====
>>>> 
>>>> From: "Bruce Bannerman" <bruce.bannerman.os...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: standa...@lists.osgeo.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 10:21:02 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Standards] Spare OGC membership slot
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Jonathon,
>>>> 
>>>> Are you still interested in taking up an OSGeo membership slot within OGC.
>>>> 
>>>> It will give you a private membership that you will be able to use to 
>>>> participate within various OGC working groups and access member only OGC 
>>>> content.
>>>> 
>>>> If so, then I suggest that you use the membership slot to see how you can 
>>>> best contribute your skills to benefit both organisations.
>>>> 
>>>> I request that you provide updates to this list, at least yearly, but 
>>>> ideally when you come across items that you believe will be of interest to 
>>>> the OSGeo community.
>>>> 
>>>> You’ll find a wealth of resources on the OGC web site:
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.opengeospatial.org/
>>>> 
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Bruce
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 12 Feb 2019, at 02:17, Jonathan Moules <jonathan-li...@lightpear.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>> 
>>>> I might be. It depends what it entails etc, and what value it would bring 
>>>> to OSGeo.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jonathan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 2019-02-10 23:58, Bruce Bannerman wrote:
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> 
>>>> Do we have anyone on the Standards List who has an interest in filling our 
>>>> spare 
>>>> OGC Individual Membership slot?
>>>> 
>>>> I’m just after an expression of interest at this stage, to see if a 
>>>> selection process is required.
>>>> 
>>>> If you are interested, please indicate so by simply replying to this email 
>>>> and stating so by the 18th Feb GMT.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Bruce
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>> 
>>>> From: Bruce Bannerman <bruce.bannerman.os...@gmail.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: OGC membership for Angelos Tzotsos and Jáchym Cepicky
>>>> Date: 2 February 2019 at 08:21:36 AEDT
>>>> To: bsher...@opengeospatial.org
>>>> Cc: standa...@lists.osgeo.org
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Barbara,
>>>> 
>>>> We will renew Angelos’ membership.
>>>> 
>>>> I will need to initiate a process to fill Jachym’s now vacant membership.
>>>> 
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Bruce
>>>> 
>>>> On 1 Feb 2019, at 22:35, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Bruce and all,
>>>> 
>>>> there is nothing I could report - my slot currently  at sleeping mode
>>>> and (I offered it in the past) available for someone more active
>>>> 
>>>> If anybody needs this, please step ahead and take over
>>>> 
>>>> thanks
>>>> 
>>>> Jachym
>>>> 
>>>> čt 31. 1. 2019 v 21:13 odesílatel Bruce Bannerman
>>>> <bruce.bannerman.os...@gmail.com> napsal:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Jachym,
>>>> 
>>>> I think that you may have missed this email.
>>>> 
>>>> Can you please respond by next Friday, the 8th Feb?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Bruce
>>>> 
>>>> On 18 Jan 2019, at 07:45, Bruce Bannerman 
>>>> <bruce.bannerman.os...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> @ Angelos and Jachym,
>>>> 
>>>> Before we renew your membership, can you please provide a brief report on 
>>>> the value of your OGC Membership.
>>>> 
>>>> I’d like to understand both the value that you have contributed to the OGC 
>>>> and the value that you have in turn received on behalf of OSGeo.
>>>> 
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Bruce
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>> 
>>>> From: Barbara Sherman <bsher...@opengeospatial.org>
>>>> Date: 18 January 2019 at 07:09:40 AEDT
>>>> To: Jeff McKenna <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com>, Bruce Bannerman 
>>>> <bruce.bannerman.os...@gmail.com>
>>>> Subject: OGC membership for Angelos Tzotsos and Jáchym Cepicky
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Jeff and Bruce,
>>>> 
>>>> Jáchym's OGC membership is due to be renewed on 1 March 2019 and Angelos' 
>>>> is due to renew on 1 April 2019.  Do you want to continue to offer them 
>>>> OSGeo slots?
>>>> 
>>>> Barbara
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> *****************
>>>> Barbara L. Sherman
>>>> Systems Manager/Membership Relations
>>>> Open Geospatial Consortium
>>>> 35 Main Street, Suite 5
>>>> Wayland, MA 01778
>>>> Voice:  +1 508 647 9385
>>>> Fax:  +1 508 655 2237
>>>> bsher...@opengeospatial.org
>>>> ******************
>>>> 
>>>> The OGC: Making location count.
>>>> http://www.opengeospatial.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Jachym Cepicky
>>>> e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
>>>> URL: http://les-ejk.cz
>>>> GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Standards mailing list
>>>> standa...@lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Standards mailing list
>>>> standa...@lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Standards mailing list
>>>> standa...@lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Standards mailing list
>>>> standa...@lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
>>> -- 
>>> Cameron Shorter
>>> Technology Demystifier
>>> Open Technologies and Geospatial Consultant
>>> 
>>> M +61 (0) 419 142 254
>>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>>> message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
>>> attachment. 
>>> 
>>> Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
>>> necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
>>> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored 
>>> where permitted by law.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Adam Steer
> http://spatialised.net
> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Adam_Steer
> http://au.linkedin.com/in/adamsteer
> http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0046-7236
> +61 427 091 712
> skype: adam.d.steer
> tweet: @adamdsteer
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to