Hey Jeroen, I disagree with your point of view, because (from where I'm sitting) it seems biased. You say:
> If you code with AI or review PRs, we want you involved and I invite you to > start the conversation [...] Reading between the lines, it'd seem that people who do **not** use LLMs for coding or reviews are not equally invited. The anti-LLM and LLM-skeptical folks deserve the same voice as encouragement than the pro-LLM folks. I don't think that's currently the case. > If we lose respect and stop being a welcoming community, the harm > lasts longer than any single PR. *We are in this together.* AI-assisted > coding is here to stay, and it also opens doors, [...] You seem to be asking that the anti-LLM camp should show more respect towards the pro-LLM camp, and I have to ask for the opposite. When a maintainer says "no LLM PRs", the submitter should respect and welcome that. If we don't aim for that, I bet that people are going to feel disrespected and burn out. -- Iván Sánchez Ortega <[email protected]> https://ivan.sanchezortega.es _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
