Yeah, we used to have the meetings this way but a lot of people wanted it to be more lax. That and the people that constantly set up the agendas ( Ron mostly) are now less involved with summer and all.
G Mike On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Shawn Bernard <[email protected]> wrote: > This is what it used to be. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2012-10-02, at 6:54 PM, Lynn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So it seems that meetings could use some more structure to allow for > better efficiency. > > > > Below are just suggestions: > > > > If we could have ALL issues to be discussed put on an agenda before the > meeting with an allotted amount of time and limit them to those times it > would improve things a lot. By doing this we can keep the discussion to the > emails and the meeting to what we actually need many people here for. > > > > And for items that may come up at the last minute a simple round table > at the end of the meeting. > > > > Also, a bit more respectfulness of speakers would be beneficial. Nobody > likes being interrupted. > > > > Hopefully some changes like this would allow the meetings to stay more > on topic rather than decay into circular discussions that don't resolve > anything. > > _______________________________________________ > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
