Can't vote yet... but If I could, I'd vote positive. On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Jay Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Abstain. > My preference is for a preferential ballot and I'm sure I can get the > other board members on board with it as soon as I manage to convince them > what a preferential ballot actually involves :) > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Justin Lacko <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1. >> >> On 24 October 2012 03:02, Mark Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I'd like to do a quick email poll (mailbox flood!) on this proposal: >> > >> > >> >> --------START PROPOSAL ----------- >> >> That Skullspace enter in to a new agreement of at least 3 years with >> >> Assent >> >> Works and 125 Adelaide regardless of space configuration so long as: >> >> * The cost sharing is equitable, with rent proportional to space >> >> exclusive >> >> to each of Skullspace and Assent Works >> >> * The $3000 requested be repaid over 3 years >> >> * Any renovations and legal fees required to bring this agreement in >> to >> >> effect be split >> >> * Any renovations required to transfer current skullspace to Asset >> works >> >> (if this happens at all) be split >> >> -------END PROPOSAL------------ >> >> >> >> Do you support this proposal, yes or no? >> > >> > >> > Reply with +1 for yes and -1 for no. >> > >> > Remember, a no (-1) vote is not specifically a vote to leave -- feel >> free to >> > also chime in with -1 if broad acceptance of the new terms goes too far >> and >> > you only want to accept these terms with the promise of a specific space >> > configuration included. >> > >> > As an email poll this is non-binding. >> > >> > If the board's first instinct is against a preferential ballot (see last >> > post), a large number of -1 votes here may help convince them >> re-consider -- >> > a choice of a different system may be too biased towards the default >> (leave) >> > option and they'll see that the stay under any configuration option >> isn't >> > well supported either. >> > >> > Given that the majority of the board wants us to stay in some form, we >> can >> > help them realize that a of process may be required to give the stay >> options >> > a fair chance. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >> _______________________________________________ >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
