-1 I feel the landlord has dealt with us in poor faith by asking us to pay more than was required by our lease... backdating it to when we moved in... and then signing another lease while we still have one.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:08 AM, chris kluka <[email protected]> wrote: > Can't vote yet... but If I could, I'd vote positive. > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Jay Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Abstain. >> My preference is for a preferential ballot and I'm sure I can get the >> other board members on board with it as soon as I manage to convince them >> what a preferential ballot actually involves :) >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Justin Lacko <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1. >>> >>> On 24 October 2012 03:02, Mark Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > I'd like to do a quick email poll (mailbox flood!) on this proposal: >>> > >>> > >>> >> --------START PROPOSAL ----------- >>> >> That Skullspace enter in to a new agreement of at least 3 years with >>> >> Assent >>> >> Works and 125 Adelaide regardless of space configuration so long as: >>> >> * The cost sharing is equitable, with rent proportional to space >>> >> exclusive >>> >> to each of Skullspace and Assent Works >>> >> * The $3000 requested be repaid over 3 years >>> >> * Any renovations and legal fees required to bring this agreement in >>> to >>> >> effect be split >>> >> * Any renovations required to transfer current skullspace to Asset >>> works >>> >> (if this happens at all) be split >>> >> -------END PROPOSAL------------ >>> >> >>> >> Do you support this proposal, yes or no? >>> > >>> > >>> > Reply with +1 for yes and -1 for no. >>> > >>> > Remember, a no (-1) vote is not specifically a vote to leave -- feel >>> free to >>> > also chime in with -1 if broad acceptance of the new terms goes too >>> far and >>> > you only want to accept these terms with the promise of a specific >>> space >>> > configuration included. >>> > >>> > As an email poll this is non-binding. >>> > >>> > If the board's first instinct is against a preferential ballot (see >>> last >>> > post), a large number of -1 votes here may help convince them >>> re-consider -- >>> > a choice of a different system may be too biased towards the default >>> (leave) >>> > option and they'll see that the stay under any configuration option >>> isn't >>> > well supported either. >>> > >>> > Given that the majority of the board wants us to stay in some form, we >>> can >>> > help them realize that a of process may be required to give the stay >>> options >>> > a fair chance. >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >>> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >>> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
