Regardless of how the alternatives might look, we have NOT waived the old
lease.

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It is effectively - as I understand it - the situation we're in. The
> alternative to "waiving" the current lease is a useless legal battle
> where we end up - at best - with winning and having to leave in 6 months
> regardless.
>
> Ron
>
> On 2012-10-25 10:42, Jay Smith wrote:
> > I'm sorry, and I understand that you're just relaying what Ron said, but
> it
> > isn't correct.
> >
> > - We have not waved the old lease
> > - We did not 'agree' to let them sign the document. Our stance is that we
> > can't stop them from signing the document with the landlord, but we have
> > not yet recognized it as an official lease.
> > - AW has not agreed to letting us stay on 6 months, it's one of many
> ideas
> > being discussed.
> > - Anything not coming directly from Courtney or Myself regarding
> > discussions with AW is just rumor (or in this case, a game of telephone).
> >
> > Ron's explanation is a possible outcome, but it has not happened yet.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I called it "waiving", as I believe that is the correct legal term.
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is the actual chat log.  (For those who don't know, iago-x86 is
> Ron.)
> > >
> > >
> > >  [10:11] <+iago-x86> They effectively said they'll invoke the 6 month
> > > clause, but gave us the option to agree to disregard the new lease
> (legal
> > > if we both consent) and sign a new one immediately
> > > [10:12] <+iago-x86> AssentWorks wanted to sign right away - it would be
> > > difficult for them to deal with the uncertainty, so we agreed to let
> them
> > > [10:12] <+iago-x86> Then AW gave us the option to stay on our current
> > > terms for 6 months (with them) or sign a new one and pay our share
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Courtney Lofchick <
> [email protected]
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Who said we waived our rights?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Apparently we have *waived* our right to our existing lease to avoid
> > >>> forcing the landlord to invoke the six month clause.
> > >>>
> > >>> AssentWorks will (but has not yet) signed a new lease, agreeing to
> the
> > >>> new terms (retroactively paying electrical bills and paying all new
> utility
> > >>> bills).
> > >>>
> > >>> We could then sublease from AW for six months under the terms of the
> > >>> original lease, or for the remainder of their new lease at
> appropriate
> > >>> terms.  They would presumably want to pass on their new, higher,
> costs.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Justin Lacko <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Siu,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I appreciate your concern and volunteering to cover some preliminary
> > >>>> legal costs. I think I need to stress again that we're beyond the
> > >>>> details of the legality of the lease and we're now focused on
> whether
> > >>>> we stay and reduce our footprint, or we find a new space. Your money
> > >>>> would be much better spent on helping out with upcoming electrical
> > >>>> costs - no matter where we end up there will be these costs.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ~Justin
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 25 October 2012 09:34, Courtney Lofchick <[email protected]>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>> > If they want of request AW pay back electrical in a future
> contract
> > >>>> then it
> > >>>> > is not illegal. Especially if they agree to it. We don't have to
> pay
> > >>>> it
> > >>>> > unless we stay. The landlord is not imposing that on us, AW is.
> > >>>> > Claiming we don't have a lease is different. We have one, but
> it's not
> > >>>> > relevant. They can give us 6 months if they want to.
> > >>>> > You don't need to get a lawyer to determine if the landlord is
> > >>>> > untrustworthy. A quick look at court records will show their track
> > >>>> record.
> > >>>> > That being said if you want to pay for a lawyer please do so but
> > >>>> perhaps it
> > >>>> > would be better put to helping us come to an agreement with AW if
> we
> > >>>> stay.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Roswyne <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >> You can't change a contract once it's signed - the whole point of
> > >>>> signing
> > >>>> >> it is to confirm and finalize what the terms are.  It's illegal
> for
> > >>>> them to
> > >>>> >> insist on anything that wasn't covered in the contract.
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >> As far as I can tell, they're sticking to their story that we
> never
> > >>>> had a
> > >>>> >> contract, which is interesting to say the least.  They certainly
> > >>>> collected
> > >>>> >> rent in accordance with it.
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >> Is there a particular reason that the board doesn't want a
> lawyer to
> > >>>> see
> > >>>> >> the contracts?  I understand it's an extra expense, but I've
> already
> > >>>> offered
> > >>>> >> to cover that.
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Ron <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>>> >>>
> > >>>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >>>> >>> Hash: SHA1
> > >>>> >>>
> > >>>> >>> They're not illegal. There's nothing stopping them from saying
> > >>>> "your new
> > >>>> >>> lease requires you to pay us $6000 immediately". The only
> sketchy
> > >>>> thing
> > >>>> >>> is signing a second lease while the first is in effect, but that
> > >>>> isn't
> > >>>> >>> harming us in any way so I'm not worried.
> > >>>> >>>
> > >>>> >>> Ron
> > >>>> >>>
> > >>>> >>> On 2012-10-25 09:12, Roswyne wrote:
> > >>>> >>> > To follow up on this - I think it makes a significant
> difference
> > >>>> >>> > whether or
> > >>>> >>> > not their actions have been illegal.  If they've been legal,
> then
> > >>>> we
> > >>>> >>> > can
> > >>>> >>> > continue to deal with them... but if they've violated their
> > >>>> contracts
> > >>>> >>> > with
> > >>>> >>> > us, then we can't trust them at all.
> > >>>> >>> >
> > >>>> >>> > If I can get copies of our two leases, I'll take them to a
> lawyer
> > >>>> for
> > >>>> >>> > review *at my own expense*.
> > >>>> >>> >
> > >>>> >>> >
> > >>>> >>> >
> > >>>> >>> >
> > >>>> >>> >
> > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Roswyne <[email protected]>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>> >>> >
> > >>>> >>> > > My experience says that people who behave unfairly do so
> > >>>> >>> > > consistently, and
> > >>>> >>> > > escalate until you stop giving in to them.
> > >>>> >>> > >
> > >>>> >>> > > We all know how this has continuously gotten worse as its
> > >>>> progressed.
> > >>>> >>> > > Why
> > >>>> >>> > > give them another chance to shock us?
> > >>>> >>> > >
> > >>>> >>> > > Moving time and costs will depend on what we take with us,
> > >>>> based on
> > >>>> >>> > > the
> > >>>> >>> > > size of the new place and what people consider important.
> For
> > >>>> >>> > > example, if
> > >>>> >>> > > we don't have room for six couches, we won't take them all.
> And
> > >>>> >>> > > Assentworks
> > >>>> >>> > > might be happy to inheirit the ones we leave.
> > >>>> >>> > >
> > >>>> >>> > > Similarly, people can take back any "lent" items and
> personal
> > >>>> >>> > > projects.
> > >>>> >>> > > Tables can be folded down, and benches and shelves can be
> > >>>> >>> > > disassembled.
> > >>>> >>> > >
> > >>>> >>> > > We shouldn't over plan the new location. Its easy to make
> plans
> > >>>> - one
> > >>>> >>> > > person can do that alone. But it takes a team to build
> > >>>> everything.
> > >>>> >>> > >
> > >>>> >>> > > We'll do better to embrace a flexible, adaptive floor
> layout,
> > >>>> and let
> > >>>> >>> > > it
> > >>>> >>> > > grow based on need/usage.
> > >>>> >>> > >
> > >>>> >>> > >
> > >>>> >>>
> > >>>> >>> > _______________________________________________
> > >>>> >>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> > >>>> >>> > Help:
> > >>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> > >>>> >>> > Archive:
> > >>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> > >>>> >>>
> > >>>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >>>> >>> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
> > >>>> >>>
> > >>>> >>> iEYEARECAAYFAlCJSWwACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/QnHQCfa1Wt0Q/u8EY8Iv0ea2AhlF+s
> > >>>> >>> EssAnA3pOsfSM2dxn3cSbjKY6M00aVIk
> > >>>> >>> =/z5o
> > >>>> >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >>>> >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> >>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> > >>>> >>> Help:
> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> > >>>> >>> Archive:
> > >>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >>
> > >>>> >> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> > >>>> >> Help:
> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> > >>>> >> Archive:
> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > _______________________________________________
> > >>>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> > >>>> > Help:
> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> > >>>> > Archive:
> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> > >>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> > >>>> Archive:
> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> > >>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> > >>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> > >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> > >> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> > > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> > >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlCJXqYACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/Tg1QCg2AGo5b7qeX9EpnDrUdrylUlW
> nEUAn0HyFyokoA8yKM1AKmQSMV8P5KVa
> =Yyj0
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to