There seems to be two positions here. The official one, and the
"plainly obvious" one...

I really think that we need to get past the discussion of "do we have
a lease or not/does our old lease still mean something" and focus on
the task at hand, which is whether we're staying or not!

On 25 October 2012 10:54, Ron <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Not officially, but barring any craziness, isn't that the plan?
>
> Ron
>
> On 2012-10-25 10:49, Jay Smith wrote:
>> Regardless of how the alternatives might look, we have NOT waived the old
>> lease.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > It is effectively - as I understand it - the situation we're in. The
>> > alternative to "waiving" the current lease is a useless legal battle
>> > where we end up - at best - with winning and having to leave in 6 months
>> > regardless.
>> >
>> > Ron
>> >
>> > On 2012-10-25 10:42, Jay Smith wrote:
>> > > I'm sorry, and I understand that you're just relaying what Ron said, but
>> > it
>> > > isn't correct.
>> > >
>> > > - We have not waved the old lease
>> > > - We did not 'agree' to let them sign the document. Our stance is that we
>> > > can't stop them from signing the document with the landlord, but we have
>> > > not yet recognized it as an official lease.
>> > > - AW has not agreed to letting us stay on 6 months, it's one of many
>> > ideas
>> > > being discussed.
>> > > - Anything not coming directly from Courtney or Myself regarding
>> > > discussions with AW is just rumor (or in this case, a game of telephone).
>> > >
>> > > Ron's explanation is a possible outcome, but it has not happened yet.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I called it "waiving", as I believe that is the correct legal term.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Here is the actual chat log.  (For those who don't know, iago-x86 is
>> > Ron.)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >  [10:11] <+iago-x86> They effectively said they'll invoke the 6 month
>> > > > clause, but gave us the option to agree to disregard the new lease
>> > (legal
>> > > > if we both consent) and sign a new one immediately
>> > > > [10:12] <+iago-x86> AssentWorks wanted to sign right away - it would be
>> > > > difficult for them to deal with the uncertainty, so we agreed to let
>> > them
>> > > > [10:12] <+iago-x86> Then AW gave us the option to stay on our current
>> > > > terms for 6 months (with them) or sign a new one and pay our share
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Courtney Lofchick <
>> > [email protected]
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Who said we waived our rights?
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> Apparently we have *waived* our right to our existing lease to avoid
>> > > >>> forcing the landlord to invoke the six month clause.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> AssentWorks will (but has not yet) signed a new lease, agreeing to
>> > the
>> > > >>> new terms (retroactively paying electrical bills and paying all new
>> > utility
>> > > >>> bills).
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> We could then sublease from AW for six months under the terms of the
>> > > >>> original lease, or for the remainder of their new lease at
>> > appropriate
>> > > >>> terms.  They would presumably want to pass on their new, higher,
>> > costs.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Justin Lacko <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> Siu,
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> I appreciate your concern and volunteering to cover some preliminary
>> > > >>>> legal costs. I think I need to stress again that we're beyond the
>> > > >>>> details of the legality of the lease and we're now focused on
>> > whether
>> > > >>>> we stay and reduce our footprint, or we find a new space. Your money
>> > > >>>> would be much better spent on helping out with upcoming electrical
>> > > >>>> costs - no matter where we end up there will be these costs.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> ~Justin
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On 25 October 2012 09:34, Courtney Lofchick <[email protected]>
>> > > >>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>> > If they want of request AW pay back electrical in a future
>> > contract
>> > > >>>> then it
>> > > >>>> > is not illegal. Especially if they agree to it. We don't have to
>> > pay
>> > > >>>> it
>> > > >>>> > unless we stay. The landlord is not imposing that on us, AW is.
>> > > >>>> > Claiming we don't have a lease is different. We have one, but
>> > it's not
>> > > >>>> > relevant. They can give us 6 months if they want to.
>> > > >>>> > You don't need to get a lawyer to determine if the landlord is
>> > > >>>> > untrustworthy. A quick look at court records will show their track
>> > > >>>> record.
>> > > >>>> > That being said if you want to pay for a lawyer please do so but
>> > > >>>> perhaps it
>> > > >>>> > would be better put to helping us come to an agreement with AW if
>> > we
>> > > >>>> stay.
>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >>>> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Roswyne <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>>> >>
>> > > >>>> >> You can't change a contract once it's signed - the whole point of
>> > > >>>> signing
>> > > >>>> >> it is to confirm and finalize what the terms are.  It's illegal
>> > for
>> > > >>>> them to
>> > > >>>> >> insist on anything that wasn't covered in the contract.
>> > > >>>> >>
>> > > >>>> >> As far as I can tell, they're sticking to their story that we
>> > never
>> > > >>>> had a
>> > > >>>> >> contract, which is interesting to say the least.  They certainly
>> > > >>>> collected
>> > > >>>> >> rent in accordance with it.
>> > > >>>> >>
>> > > >>>> >> Is there a particular reason that the board doesn't want a
>> > lawyer to
>> > > >>>> see
>> > > >>>> >> the contracts?  I understand it's an extra expense, but I've
>> > already
>> > > >>>> offered
>> > > >>>> >> to cover that.
>> > > >>>> >>
>> > > >>>> >>
>> > > >>>> >>
>> > > >>>> >>
>> > > >>>> >>
>> > > >>>> >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Ron <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>>> >>>
>> > > >>>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > > >>>> >>> Hash: SHA1
>> > > >>>> >>>
>> > > >>>> >>> They're not illegal. There's nothing stopping them from saying
>> > > >>>> "your new
>> > > >>>> >>> lease requires you to pay us $6000 immediately". The only
>> > sketchy
>> > > >>>> thing
>> > > >>>> >>> is signing a second lease while the first is in effect, but that
>> > > >>>> isn't
>> > > >>>> >>> harming us in any way so I'm not worried.
>> > > >>>> >>>
>> > > >>>> >>> Ron
>> > > >>>> >>>
>> > > >>>> >>> On 2012-10-25 09:12, Roswyne wrote:
>> > > >>>> >>> > To follow up on this - I think it makes a significant
>> > difference
>> > > >>>> >>> > whether or
>> > > >>>> >>> > not their actions have been illegal.  If they've been legal,
>> > then
>> > > >>>> we
>> > > >>>> >>> > can
>> > > >>>> >>> > continue to deal with them... but if they've violated their
>> > > >>>> contracts
>> > > >>>> >>> > with
>> > > >>>> >>> > us, then we can't trust them at all.
>> > > >>>> >>> >
>> > > >>>> >>> > If I can get copies of our two leases, I'll take them to a
>> > lawyer
>> > > >>>> for
>> > > >>>> >>> > review *at my own expense*.
>> > > >>>> >>> >
>> > > >>>> >>> >
>> > > >>>> >>> >
>> > > >>>> >>> >
>> > > >>>> >>> >
>> > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Roswyne <[email protected]>
>> > > >>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>> >>> >
>> > > >>>> >>> > > My experience says that people who behave unfairly do so
>> > > >>>> >>> > > consistently, and
>> > > >>>> >>> > > escalate until you stop giving in to them.
>> > > >>>> >>> > >
>> > > >>>> >>> > > We all know how this has continuously gotten worse as its
>> > > >>>> progressed.
>> > > >>>> >>> > > Why
>> > > >>>> >>> > > give them another chance to shock us?
>> > > >>>> >>> > >
>> > > >>>> >>> > > Moving time and costs will depend on what we take with us,
>> > > >>>> based on
>> > > >>>> >>> > > the
>> > > >>>> >>> > > size of the new place and what people consider important.
>> > For
>> > > >>>> >>> > > example, if
>> > > >>>> >>> > > we don't have room for six couches, we won't take them all.
>> > And
>> > > >>>> >>> > > Assentworks
>> > > >>>> >>> > > might be happy to inheirit the ones we leave.
>> > > >>>> >>> > >
>> > > >>>> >>> > > Similarly, people can take back any "lent" items and
>> > personal
>> > > >>>> >>> > > projects.
>> > > >>>> >>> > > Tables can be folded down, and benches and shelves can be
>> > > >>>> >>> > > disassembled.
>> > > >>>> >>> > >
>> > > >>>> >>> > > We shouldn't over plan the new location. Its easy to make
>> > plans
>> > > >>>> - one
>> > > >>>> >>> > > person can do that alone. But it takes a team to build
>> > > >>>> everything.
>> > > >>>> >>> > >
>> > > >>>> >>> > > We'll do better to embrace a flexible, adaptive floor
>> > layout,
>> > > >>>> and let
>> > > >>>> >>> > > it
>> > > >>>> >>> > > grow based on need/usage.
>> > > >>>> >>> > >
>> > > >>>> >>> > >
>> > > >>>> >>>
>> > > >>>> >>> > _______________________________________________
>> > > >>>> >>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> > > >>>> >>> > Help:
>> > > >>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> > > >>>> >>> > Archive:
>> > > >>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>> > > >>>> >>>
>> > > >>>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > > >>>> >>> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
>> > > >>>> >>>
>> > > >>>> >>> iEYEARECAAYFAlCJSWwACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/QnHQCfa1Wt0Q/u8EY8Iv0ea2AhlF+s
>> > > >>>> >>> EssAnA3pOsfSM2dxn3cSbjKY6M00aVIk
>> > > >>>> >>> =/z5o
>> > > >>>> >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > > >>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> > > >>>> >>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> > > >>>> >>> Help:
>> > http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> > > >>>> >>> Archive:
>> > > >>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>> > > >>>> >>
>> > > >>>> >>
>> > > >>>> >>
>> > > >>>> >> _______________________________________________
>> > > >>>> >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> > > >>>> >> Help:
>> > http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> > > >>>> >> Archive:
>> > https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >>>> > _______________________________________________
>> > > >>>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> > > >>>> > Help:
>> > http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> > > >>>> > Archive:
>> > https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>> > > >>>> _______________________________________________
>> > > >>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> > > >>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> > > >>>> Archive:
>> > https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> _______________________________________________
>> > > >>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> > > >>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> > > >>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> _______________________________________________
>> > > >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> > > >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> > > >> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> > > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> > > > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>> > > >
>> >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> > > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>> >
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
>> >
>> > iEYEARECAAYFAlCJXqYACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/Tg1QCg2AGo5b7qeX9EpnDrUdrylUlW
>> > nEUAn0HyFyokoA8yKM1AKmQSMV8P5KVa
>> > =Yyj0
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>> >
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlCJYK8ACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/QE2gCfRk/r6nMK++V4jQT5IdXszT/n
> D2AAoLaKg3tmlOhFnwBpr9AKydddahPh
> =pKmY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to