About a year ago, when there was a big question if we would be able to stay at Adelaide, I went around a few winnipeg sites and took some pictures for a presentation to be called "Skullspace 2.0: the welcoming world under Winnipeg's bridges". Guess I'll need to dig it out now.
On 10/31/12, Ron <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2012-10-31 12:20, Mark Jenkins wrote: >> > Most people want to move - even with AW being the new leasee, we have >> > no trust in the building owners not trying to screw us again by >> > ignoring contracts/the law. >> >> I think you've missed a key detail -- AW doesn't appear to have much >> faith either as they asked for an exit clause in this new lease. >> (shit, we should have noticed that detail sooner, we had a copy last >> week) > Honestly, it's that detail that got me on board with wanting to leave. > Up till we found out about that, I still wanted to make it work. But the > thought that we may be left high and dry wasn't one I wanted to > consider. > > Ron > >> >> As far as I'm concerned, being here with any exit clause, regardless of >> stated intents by landlord or tennant to use such clauses or not is a no >> go -- it gives parties the ability to demand a new deal too easilly >> instead of honouring the existing one. >> >> > (Lots of FUD about this - they could call >> > in question any of a number of permits, they hire criminals every >> > morning in the basement, etc. We have no leverage and they have all of >> > it.) >> >> I fully agree. The only real gun is the exit clause. >> >> It would be extreme stupidity for a landlord to just suddenly lock doors >> (prompting possible legal action) or initiate their own legal action >> claiming violation of lease when they can just use the exit clause. The >> former options are full of financial risk and uncertainty, the later >> less so. >> >> Locking the doors or initiating legal action only makes sense for a >> landlord dealing with a tennant who's conduct is so bad that the risks >> of keeping them over the exit period are worse then the risks of trying >> to boot them faster. >> >> The amount that six more months of electrical here would of entailed >> would have been nothing compared court costs those useless nuclear >> options would have entailed. >> _______________________________________________ >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAlCRXyIACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/TdNACfX00IsSwWw2CtncbdMrjNKA06 > pXUAn2BVLaAPtdAkmhj2Zv929chRof1t > =iUjf > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > _______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
