pdp 10 hahahahah that aint a pdp 10...

this is a pdp 10......
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/computinghistory/ka10.jpg

wait that tape drive is not from a pdp10...
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Michael Kozakewich <
[email protected]> wrote:

>   You know what, normally I wouldn’t say anything, except that there is
> literally no content in that one. Just a little more, and maybe he’ll get
> into some book of world records.
>
>  *From:* chris kluka <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 28, 2013 8:27 PM
> *To:* Discuss, SkullSpace <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [SkullSpace-Discuss] In defense of Swordfish
>
>  Your email to signature ratio of 3:174 is impressive.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ken DeWitt <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> lol
>>
>>  Any question or comments you can email or call me at any time.
>> I will get back to you as fast as I can.
>>
>> Thank you and have a nice day!!
>>
>> Ken DeWitt
>> Your Fellow Tech. Guy
>>
>> Phone # : 204-998-3218
>> Email: 
>> mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>
>> ftg.ca
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Ian E. Trump <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> boobies
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nathan T. Wild
>>> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 19:07
>>> To: SkullSpace
>>> Subject: Re: [SkullSpace-Discuss] In defense of Swordfish
>>>
>>> In defense of Swordfish: Halle Berry.
>>>
>>> That is all.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nathan T. Wild
>>> Ralph Brown Community Centre Inc.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Mark Jenkins <[email protected]>
>>> Sender: [email protected]: Mon, 28 Jan 2013
>>> 19:04:16
>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>> Reply-To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [SkullSpace-Discuss] In defense of Swordfish
>>>
>>> Ian wrote:
>>> > 2. The hacker movie you despise, why?
>>> >
>>> > Swordfish
>>>
>>> On balance, I find Swordfish to be okay (not great) as a film and not
>>> terrible. Some of the bad hacking crap is offset by what I consider to
>>> be a really good hacking scene later in the movie
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjGbvpr_dB8
>>> (This isn't the notorious crypto break with human distraction earlier in
>>> the film)
>>>
>>> Once your get past the dramatization, ridiculous GUI and ridiculous rig
>>> there's lots of good stuff there:
>>>
>>> * A dead drop
>>>
>>> * A great retro computing reference, complete with tape drive
>>>
>>> * Long basement tunnel cabling run
>>>
>>> * Re-use of old code
>>>
>>> * Adaptation of old code for current circumstances required, can't just
>>> use the old stuff
>>>
>>> * Distractions removed, non-hackers out of the room
>>>
>>> * Late night setting
>>>
>>> * Frustration when things aren't going well, but not quiting
>>>
>>> * Waiting for compiling/linking/testing http://xkcd.com/303/, with
>>> uncertainty while you wait for them to complete to your satisfaction
>>>
>>> * Incremental and modular development, with joy/celebration as each unit
>>> of progress is completed
>>>
>>> * Realization that you've forgotten many little details that you used to
>>> know when you've been away from something for awhile
>>>
>>> * Taking a break (and coming back inspired)
>>>
>>> * Talking to yourself while working
>>> http://justseventhings.com/2009/01/25/why-talking-to-yourself-might-be-t
>>> he-highest-form-of-intelligence/
>>>
>>> * Despite being involved in rather serious business, Stanly manges to
>>> have fun and be playful while working on this (yes, its over the top) Is
>>> this perhaps hinting at a more general spirit playful cleverness being
>>> present?
>>> http://stallman.org/articles/on-hacking.html
>>>
>>> * Serious amount of time elapse (hours) for work to get done (unlike
>>> earlier bad scene under pressure)
>>>
>>> * Exhaustion (sleep and mental) when done
>>>
>>> * Bad personal health habits (smoking, excessive drinking?)
>>>
>>>
>>> What other film has this many good elements all in one scene?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to