The message loses its terseness with that informative introduction, and charming closing line of Jay/Sporked :P
On 6 April 2013 00:55, Jay Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Normally I'm not a fan of terse replies in discuss, but this time I think > it's fitting: > > wtf? > > - Jay / @Sporked > On 2013-04-06 12:47 AM, "Roswyne" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think it's always been said that we shouldn't expect privacy from any >> free internet access point, especially at SkullSpace, where various >> experimentation may be occurring. >> >> A word to the wise: this has never been more applicable than now... but >> I'm naming no names. :) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
