If "new members" get in on a group membership. I might be interested. I just can't justify paying over 100$ a month for something that I would only use once in awhile.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Adam Thompson <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tue 25 Jun 2013 12:36:10 PM CDT, Roswyne wrote: > >> I can't think of any reason AW would mind - but you'd need someone to >> coordinate it and take responsibility for the full "corporate" rate >> and all subsidiary memberships. >> >> It'd be like you signing a lease on a house and then collecting from >> all your roommates that are sharing the place. In theory, you'd all >> save money... But if anything goes awry, you're stuck with a large >> personal debt. >> > > Yeah. Also, I ran the numbers... if you have the $60/month deal going, > we'd have to get five people (minimum) to save any money, and it would only > save $2/month. (Six people would save $5/month.) > So it's not of much benefit except to new AW members (like me). > -Adam > > > ______________________________**_________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: > http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/**index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss<http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss> > Archive: > https://groups.google.com/**group/skullspace-discuss-**archive/<https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/> >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
