I agree, I've just never setup IPv6 on MT, want to learn by doing it at Sksp, but haven't had time yet - hopefully this week.
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Theo Baschak <theod...@ciscodude.net> wrote: > Seems like it would be a good time to also implement IPv6? Mikrotik is > pretty decent at it. > > I’ve been reserving 2604:4280:c0de::/48 to be routed to skullspace and > then further cut up internally however you choose. (the public side network > has 2604:4280:1:c0de::/64) > > Theo > > On Dec 7, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I've set the router to start giving out 172.30.6.100-240 IPs, and will > send server owners request to change to new IPs to help us move out of the > overused 192.168.1.x range. Both networks are routed so everything can talk > to each other while we do the migration. > > _______________________________________________ > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/