I agree, I've just never setup IPv6 on MT, want to learn by doing it at
Sksp, but haven't had time yet - hopefully this week.


On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Theo Baschak <theod...@ciscodude.net> wrote:

> Seems like it would be a good time to also implement IPv6? Mikrotik is
> pretty decent at it.
>
> I’ve been reserving 2604:4280:c0de::/48 to be routed to skullspace and
> then further cut up internally however you choose. (the public side network
> has 2604:4280:1:c0de::/64)
>
> Theo
>
> On Dec 7, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I've set the router to start giving out 172.30.6.100-240 IPs, and will
> send server owners request to change to new IPs to help us move out of the
> overused 192.168.1.x range. Both networks are routed so everything can talk
> to each other while we do the migration.
> > _______________________________________________
> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to