On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:35:54 -0800, Phil Karn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Shorten still seems to be popular on bt.etree.org and other sites where > audience recordings of taper-friendly bands are traded. I can't figure > out why, as flac seems to be superior to shorten in every way. FLAC > files are about 5% smaller, and they support metatags. It's mostly habit - these people have been using shorten for eons and have scripts that automate their process etc. When I get such files I transcode to flac for my own purposes. -- http://mpeters.us/ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
