Dan, some answers to you questions ...

-------Original Message-------
> From: "Dan Sully" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [slim] Re: First Impressions 6.0B1-1
> Sent: 13 Mar 2005 17:51:19
>
>  * Richard shaped the electrons to say...
>  
>  >I made the move to 6.0 B1-1 last evening, with mixed results.  Here are my 
> findings:
>  
>  Richard - thanks for the feedback. Most of these have been fixed in the
>  latest nightly builds, and will be in the next beta release.
>  
>  > 1) FLAC.  I have been running 5.4 since it was releases with never a skip
>  > on FLAC files.  Every FLAC file I play on 6.0 B1-1 results in playback
>  > skips.  Any suggestions for improving throughput?  I am using a wired
>  > Ethernet Network with 3 Wired Squeezeboxes. (I did reboot my server and the
>  > problem seems to have cleared up somewhat – I still get drops when doing
>  > HTML web interface commands while music is playing)
>  
>  Has the server finished scanning all your files? Did you have a large
>  playlist loaded while viewing the web UI?

Yes, server completed scan.  About 20 songs in playlist while browsing other 
selections (not searching).  I think CPU on this box is an Intel 1.6Mhz, and 
512MB RAM if my memory serves me right.
>  
>  > 2) The overall speed of the Web Interface is slower.  Sometimes
>  > considerably slower.  I have never had any sort of performance issues with
>  > the web interface under 5.4 and below, and have started experiencing some
>  > frustrating delays when using the server html.
>  
>  What browser are you using? Fishbone skin it looks like?

Fishbone.
>  
>  Are there specific operations that you find are slower?

No, browsinsg from Artist to Album, or Album to Song is enough.
>  
>  > 3) Searching.  Simply put, a frustrating step backward.  When using the
>  > Fishbone interface, I could search for an artist out of my 17,000 simply
>  > from the browse pages, now I have to go to advanced search.  When I try the
>  > Search Music screen, all I get is the names of songs returned not artists.
>  > This is not at all accommodating for the way I look for music.
>  
>  This has been fixed - search now displays Artist, Album and Tracks. It sounds
>  like you hit the fallback search, instead of the "Live Search"
>  

Great, can't wait.

>  > 4) The Advanced Search is a good step forward as a search improvement, NOT 
> a replacement.  
>  
>  Agreed.
>  
>  > 5) I thought cataloging music into the DB would be faster based on claims.
>  > I found it to take about the same amount of time as 5.4.
>  
>  Things like MP3 scanning have been speed up, but we're also doing a lot more
>  at the database level. I've personally heard varying degrees of improvment,
>  but most have been improved.
>  
>  Know what type of system you're running, and specifics of your library would 
> help.

Library:  1254 albums with 17179 songs by 1215 artists - mostly MP3 (192kb and 
higher) - some FLAC and OGG

Running Redhat 9
>  
>  > 6) Fishbone Skin does not always display correctly.  My personal choice of
>  > skin ends up losing its navigation on the left frame after some actions (I
>  > think after being in Server Settings and hitting Home link).
>  
>  I'll let kdf answer this, as he maintains this skin.

Great.

>  
>  > 7) Even after new install, had to select Wipe Cache to begin proper song
>  > cataloguing.  Not obvious for the new user.
>  
>  Did you install any of the 6.0 alpha releases?

No, cleaned out 5.4 and did RPM -i slim*  
>  
>  > 8) Ogg files worked straight out of the box where I had to do some 
> tweaking under 5.4.
>  
>  Great.
>  
>  -D
>  --
>  They're techno trousers, ex-NASA, fantastic for walkies!
>  _______________________________________________
>  Discuss mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
-------Original Message-------


Thanks for the great product and looking into these issues.

Richard at richardascott.com
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to