I imagine he explains it by saying that each case is unique. It's completely possible that even two people with comparable setups would have different experiences.
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:40:29 -0500, PAUL WILLIAMSON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/23/05 10:40 PM >>> > > The problem with the existing server, just as you point out, > > is that the real-time and non-real-time server functions are > > bundled into the same tasks and threads, and insufficient > > attention has been paid to meeting real-time-critical playback > > requirements. Yes, the bigger buffer in the SB2 will definitely > > help (I have one on order) but I disagree that it's the only > > way or even the best way to solve the problem. > > With all this information, how do you explain that I've got a > wired squezeboxG and a 100mb switched environment, > all FLACs, that play all day long with no skips or dropouts, > all powered from a lowly PIII 800Mhz box with 512mb > of ram and 4x250gb drives, all LVM'd together for about > 1tb of space? Your machine is definitely got more "oomph" > than mine, yet I've got no problems. > > I had a party a couple weeks ago, and using the latest nightly > of the 5.4.1 branch (don't remember the day - maybe 3/11?) > without a single problem. > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
