On Friday 25 March 2005 02:28 pm, Bill Moseley wrote: > I've seen two methods posted lately. One used cdrdao to just grab the > toc file (read-toc) and then use cdparanoia piped to flac to generate > the flac. > > > flac --endian=big --sign=signed --channels=2 --bps=16 --sample-rate=44100 > > \ --cuesheet=album.cue album.bin > > Here you are using the bin file extracted by cdrdao instead. > > My question has to do with the toc file. cdrdao generates a different > toc file with just using read-toc vs. read-cd.
The only difference I notice is that the read-toc command with the --fast-toc option picks up the correct ISRC code, whereas the read-cd command does not. Other than that, I've not seen any difference in the TOC files. This is why I use 'read-toc --fast-toc' to get the TOC file, and than I use cdparanoia to rip the entire disc to a single WAV file. I must admit, though, that I'm still working out the process I'm going to use to rip my collection and I've only tested with a pretty small sample size of CDs thus far. Perhaps the difference you're seeing is related to the particular disc or CD-ROM drive that you're using? > What about when I have ripped into separate flac files and also have > the original toc from cdrdao read-toc? Just write as separate wav > files and edit the toc for each file name? Or is there some kind of > "catwav" program to join them before burning with cdrdao? You can use shntool to concatenate WAV files, and many other types of audio files as well. -- Jason Voegele Accept people for what they are -- completely unacceptable.
pgpjUgL7KbdgD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
