On 4/21/05, Phillip Kerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, so this doesn't need to get out of hand.  In fact, I did check the DAC
> cost and it was $8.  But, right, the one in the SB2 is definitely good.
> 
> Did we ever establish which CD player is being used for comparison?  Maybe
> the DAC isn't $.99 (as if that really matters anyway).

All I was suggesting is that the difference in DAC's could be a major
part of the picture.  His daughter could hear a difference and that is
one major component that could help explain the difference.

I never said directly that the SB2 was inherently superior (in fact
going out of my way to give the listener in question the benefit of
the doubt).  I may have inferred that by referencing a hypothetical
"$0.99 DAC" but in my case I think it was obvious that $0.99 DAC is
simply code for generic $<50 CD player DAC.  If this CD player were
something of particularly high quality then I suspect the OP would
have mentioned that.

Personally I can't tell the difference between any of them.  I think
my SliMP3 playing MP3's  sounds great.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to