Jim Dibb Wrote: 
> Thanks for clarifying, Jim.  I personally ripped all my CD's at 192k
> MP3 rate and am considering doing it again differently.  The volume
> difference between different CDs was not something I had realized.
> 
> I felt sympathy to Caves of TQLT and as a supporter of the idea (and
> how it borrows from other reference counted strategies) am glad to now
> have  more insight.
> 

No problem, in later posts I might have come over as slightly
patronising but that was because I was getting annoyed that nobody
understood my "it's either lossless or it isn't" point of view.  I
never faulted the idea of the original poster, just how he was
considering implementing it blindly on his (for now) lossless
collection.

If you decide in your re-ripping to go the lossless route be careful,
over time you might become as fanatical about every single hz of audio
as me :P


-- 
Jim
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to