kdf Wrote: > It is a known issue, but those who have spent the most time working with > it are not sure, at this time, how to optimise it any more without > losing aspects of the design.
IMO, it's just plain silly to use this method of navigation to build the database. Aren't there better options for low-cost methods of cataloging newly added files? How about implementing a slow, continuous (re)scan of the music tree? Something that might take a couple hours to complete on a fast machine with a large (30k tracks?) directory. Just let it run 24/7, with the ability to turn it off. How about the ability to do a 'selective' rescan in the web interface? Say you add a new album under your Miles Davis directory. Navigate to the directory in the web interface and select that sub-tree. Hit a "rescan" button and only that bit of the tree is scanned. Not everyone will organize their music this way, but I'm fairly certain that enough of ua are using subfolders in some manner that this would be very useful. -- JJZolx _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
