> 
> Both browsing folders and playlists do not use the database, so are
> slow.
> 
> There's a bug for the playlists issue, the folders I doubt 
> anything can
> be done.

Why then does 5.x seem to outperform 6.x at the task of browsing folders?
Anytime someone says something can't be done--especially with software--I
just have to ask why.

Thanks,
Phillip


_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to