> On the other hand, if everyone has this convenient access to the same
> large catalog of music, that's the end for anyone who's not included
> in this catalog. Independent labels lose even more visbility and
> sales. Additionally, people will feel like "I'm already paying
> flat-rate, I'll make do without music I'd have to pay extra for." I'd
> hoped for widespread broadband to effect a de-centralisation in music
> distribution - the opposite seems to be the case.

I just wanted to mention that since using Rhapsody (I've been subscribed
about 1 year now) I've actually been exposed to far more independent
labels/groups than I ever was before Rhapsody.  This medium isn't limited in
any way (i.e., radio is time-limited) so there's no downside to adding
artists.  It's in Rhapsody's (and other subscription-type services) interest
to add any and all interested artists to their catalog so that they may draw
in more subscribers.  And the existence of more than one service provides
competition in the marketplace that keeps the royalties paid to small
artists from being unfairly low.  I don't know how their licensing deals
work but I would have to think that the subscription services compensate
artists an amount that's somehow correlated to the # of plays their music
receives.  Indeed, (haha, this is all speculation, but bear with me) they
probably have "cheaper" contracts with the smaller labels so it may very
well be that subscription services would prefer that you listen to
independent artists.  Whatever the case may be, services like Rhapsody offer
links to artists that are similar to, influenced by, forerunners of, and
collaborators with any given artist in their catalog.  Rhapsody also
monitors my listening and suggests artists, albums, and tracks I might like
(I believe this is a feature of Napster and Yahoo as well).  Often these are
from artists and groups I'd never have heard of otherwise.  There are tons
of artists out there that are getting royalties from me listening to them on
Rhapsody that would never have seen a penny from me otherwise.  Plus I still
buy CD's.

Unless the subscription services are somehow (totally illogically) banning
artists from their catalog, it seems like your "losing visibility" argument
is akin to saying "it's so unfair that we adopted the CD player because all
those artists that only want to sell cassette tapes will just not be
included and it'll be the end of them".




_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to