|
Ohh... I use all players at the same time with diffrent playlists. And when I used version 5 or maybe 4 och slimserver I was told to change all those settings. (the problem was that all players can die if I change playlist of 2-3 players to big lists with about 2-3000 songs in each) Now I run version 6.1 that is much faster than all prev. versions. I can actually run the webinterface. I stream at the speed of my songs - many are in 192 KHz. And the worst scenario is that all my 16 players want that bitrate... Nalle Slim Devices Discussion <[email protected]> skrev den 18 maj 2005 klockan 17:47 +0100: Nobody has responded, perhaps because we're lacking some information. What are the symptoms for which you seek a solution? Are the default TCP/IP parameters not working? Have you determined that the TCP/IP stack is a bottleneck? Are your players sync'd? How many are used simultaneously? At what bitrate(s) do you stream? You didn't mention your Slimserver version. One caveat with large playlists is that performance of 6.x servers may be worse than 5.4.x servers, in terms of initial load times. I base this on comments from the list, not from personal experience. Nalle Johansson wrote: > Im looking for the best TCP-settings for my system... Any idees? > > Maximum numbers of TCP sockets to read/write per pass: > > *The server* > Windows 2000 server > 1 Gb Ram > 2 Tb Hdd > 1000 Mbit NIC > > *The players* > 1 text-players (Wireless) > 10 players graphical (10 Mbit) > 5 softsqeeze on windows 2000 (100 Mbit) > > The playlists in my system are very large - up to 3000 songs. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss |
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
