Quoting Steven Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes I thought it was some sort of performance issue rather than a > bug. Could these tracks not be read into a cache on slim server start > up or after a rescan? loading all tracks into a memory cache was the method before 6.0. People hated it and kept asking why it wasn't in a database. now you know one reason why ;) -k _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
