Just wanted to take a few minutes to thank you folks at Slim Devices for
a superb product and maybe let a few lurkers out there know what a great
product this is.

First thing I noticed was that UPS was not too nice with the box.  I
thought to myself, "Wish they would have packed this inside another box
for protection."  Well, when I opened the box I saw you had done just
that.  Nice clean, white box inside, and well-packed.  Thanks!

The next thing I noticed after opening the box was that I had spent way
too much time worrying about whether the black case would look as nice
as the platinum, and which one I should get.  This soft-touch black
finish is impressive, guys, and the remote's finish matches!  (For you
lurkers: the soft-touch finish feels a little bit like the surface of a
peach.) The black fades away to nothing in my entertainment center and
all I see is the pretty VF display.

Set-up: what a breeze.  I bought the wireless unit even though I've
gone to the trouble of wiring my house in the last year (don't ask me
why; I wonder that myself).  Anyway, the setup was very
straightforward.  I first set it up in wireless mode and it had not a
bit of trouble finding and authenticating to my ancient 802.11b (not g)
Cisco Aironet 340-series basestation.

After that, figuring I might as well use the Cat5 cable in my walls, I
plugged in the ethernet cable and (using the
left-arrow-hold-to-go-back-to-setup) re-set up the box for wired mode. 
Easy as pie.

Next thoughts: Ambiguous.  Part of me felt like I was silly for
worrying about spending a couple hundred bucks on a little box to play
my music from the computer to the stereo, though it does a lot more
than that.  (Why did I wait so long?)  The other part of me was really
glad to have waited long enough to get the 3rd generation Slim Devices
box with the oh-so-cool new high-res display. [Aside for lurkers
checking out Roku: Slim's $300 box has the same vertical resolution
display as the $400 M2000.  The M2000 does have a wider display,
though.]

Next: play some tunes!  Okay, here goes.  Already know the VF display
is sweet.  Let's hook into Radioio and see what happens.  Awesome and
easy.  And I don't have to pay anything?  Wow!  I'm like a little kid
with this thing, trying out the screensavers and various settings. 
Next impression (which I already had from using SoftSqueeze, but felt
it renewed), "they've done a really nice job on this user interface." 
Then, "hope I can read this from the couch," (plop down) "Oh nice, they
put a text size button on the remote."

Back to the lurkers wondering what box you are going to buy.  Note this
is not intended to bash the other product; I'm simply stating my
opinion.  I studied Roku vs. Slim for a long time.  I checked out the
M1000 and M2000 at a local Tweeter store.  I chose the Slim product
because I felt it had a much better user interface, would be better
supported over time, and could be tweaked.  (You can read my comments
in another post from a few days ago.)  Add to that the same vertical
resolution display as the more expensive M2000, and the choice was
clear.  

That was before the Squeezebox2 arrived and I've had a chance to play
with it.  Now the choice is even clearer and I'm wondering why I ever
spent so much time looking at the other product.

Although I'm an EE, I'm a stickler about user interfaces.  Much more so
than with electrical specs.  Often a great product shows up with a
substandard UI and it's a real shame (I am not necessarily referring to
Roku here.)  Slim Devices broke the mold and did it right.

[An aside about electrical specs.  I read the white paper on the Ubicom
IP3023 processor in the Squeezebox2 and I keep wondering what gthe folks
at Slim have up their sleeves for that chip.  It a pretty nifty uP.]

My impression of the Squeezebox2 is that this is a very
well-thought-out and well-implemented design, from bottom up. Kudos to
the Slim Devices team!

- Dave


-- 
Dave D
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to