Quoting maxman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > What I get out of your posts is that the box itself actually is just a > terminal ;) I'll keep track on the load of my server to see if I can > find the root cause. So would it not be smarter to have the menu > browsing handled by the squeezebox itself without needing to contact > the server, or am I stating something impossible here?
not impossible, but the design is for a slim device. make sense? transitions are in the SB2, but to hard code all the menus and remote control handling would remove all of the flexibility, not to mention filling the codespace with menu handling instead of as many audio codecs as possible. -kdf _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
