bhaagensen;347529 Wrote: > Interesting, so you claim that encoding audiofiles with a codec you > somehow have the intellectual rights to use gives you the same legal > status as if you protected the files by some drm-scheme? I could be wrong with this, but I think it has more to do with licensing issues, rather than copy protection. Kind of like how the BBC are allowed to broadcast track information on DAB and digital TV, but they can't do it for their live or listen again web streams. Crazy isn't it?
There is also the legal question: is transcoding to another format seen as re-broadcasting? if it is, then that is probably not allowed. -- funkstar ------------------------------------------------------------------------ funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53460 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
