Mark Lanctot wrote: > DeVerm;362391 Wrote: > >> The only reason I can think of would be so that the SB uses less time on >> the air, leaving more bandwidth for other users of the router. >> > > OK, that's a good one, but a lot of people want 'n' just because it's > the latest and greatest. >
I want N because my laptop is N and now connected at 130 Mbit. Also my upstairs controller seems to have a slightly better connection. > n's increased bandwidth isn't useful on the player side because the > maximum a player will need is 4608 kbps (24/96 WAV) - almost do-able > with 802.11b and easy with most 802.11g networks. > > There's increased range and bandwidth at longer distances, but it's my > understanding that this is mostly due to MIMO on the router/AP. > > Also, can't anyone wait until 802.11n is officially released? This is > still really all draft-n. If you would need a new router right now because your old one broke. Would you buy a G? Or a G that also does N, draft perhaps but has a pretty good chance of being upgradable? Regards, Peter _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
