peter;374364 Wrote: > > > It's an interface and it's graphical isn't it? > > Regards, > Peter > > PS: I'm not too enthusiastic about it either.
>From an attractiveness point of view, I think the Softsqueeze interface is much more pleasant and interesting looking than the Squeezeplay interface. It is certainly nice to see the artwork of an album, but that can be seen in Squeezecenter. I wonder what is the point of Squeezeplay. Softsqueeze has the benefit of mirroring the Transporter/Squeezebox look and feel and can therefore be used as an excellent means of introducing newcomers to both. I can not see how Squeezeplay as it stands today could be used to attract any new user to the Squeezecenter marketplace. The fact that I have not managed to get Squeezeplay to play any one album in its entirety does not help. I have both the Squeezebox 3 and the Duet, and enjoy listening to music with the use of each. The controller is handy in that it allows use of any Squeezebox/Receiver/Transporter in the network, but I prefer the way the Squeezebox 3 system works. Being able to pick the first letter of an album or artist, as in the Squeezebox 3 remote, is tidier and faster than the somewhat stuttering spinning wheel of the Controller. Can someone please enlighten me as to where I've failed to appreciate the benefits of Squeezeplay over Softsqueeze? A very Happy Christmas to all, kesey -- kesey ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kesey's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10786 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=56934 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
