> > well, I think I'm just getting the impression that demands for how this > must > work will end up causing the one instance to double up on so much already. > Its > a given that once such a feature is created, there will be a user out > there who > will demand that it works in every different way possible. Share some > files, > not others, share prefs, not others. User defined access to players, > swappable > on the fly, admin lockouts etc. Just about any feature you name will have > at > least one person who will say that its absolutely required. The idea of > two > separate servers just cuts to the chase, though admittedly bars shared > libraries on the fly. You'd have to use symlinks. >
They have already got their own custom network transport why not just expand on it and create the SOS(Slim Operating System) and SFS(Slim File System). It would probably be easier in the long run;) The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential and for the intended use of the addressee only; it may also be legally privileged and/or price sensitive. Notice is hereby given that any disclosure, use or copying of the information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be illegal. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by Acacia Pacific Holding's e-mail system and is subjected to archiving and review by someone other than the recipient. Acacia Pacific Holdings has taken every reasonable precaution to ensure that any attachment to this e-mail has been swept for viruses. We accept no liability for any damage sustained as a result of software viruses and advise you carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
