markstrom;386717 Wrote: > I'll take your word for it, but in this case it is fiddling even more > with the aspect since the resize algorithm in Squeezecenter not seem to > be perfect. A resized 300x299 image should result in a 75x75 image > rather than a 75x74. Might file a bug on this. > Sounds reasonable. 300x299 should really result in a 75x75. > > I know how happy you are about option so is it worth requesting a pad > vs. stretch setting ? Unlikely :-) BTW, you are NOT talking about the grey line between two thumbnails, right? iPeng's thumbnails do NOT show up next to each other but there is a 1px cell separator line in between.
markstrom;386720 Wrote: > It would be nice if Squeezecenter allowed you to easy set the prefered > pre-caching. Now it's pre-caching 100x100, 56x56 and 50x50, which takes > a lot of time generating when doing a full scan. I use none of them > since I only use iPeng and the two sizes it requires is not there. Oh, yes, that would definitely be a worthwhile enhancement request. If you file that one, please tell me the bug # -- pippin --- see iPeng at penguinlovesmusic.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13777 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=55514 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
