For what it's worth, here are my experiences.

Most people seem to be thinking about running either Windows XP/2000 or
Linux. It seems to me that the lightest footprint of them all is
FreeBSD. I'm running Slimserver on a low-powered FreeBSD system:
500MHz AMD K6/2 CPU
196MB PC66 SDRAM
400GB Seagate Barracuda drive.

This is dedicated purely to Slimserver. RAM doesn't seem to be a
problem. Of the 196MB on the system, only about 50MB is actually in
use.

My music library is exclusively FLAC, currently about 10,000 songs. I'm
using just one SB2, wired on a 100Mbs LAN. Performance of the web
interface is OK but not "snappy". Using the SB2 via the remote is
pretty good. Bringing up "Browse Artists" takes about 1 or 2 seconds.

Before building this FreeBSD system, I initially ran Slimserver on the
household Win2000 server (a 533MHz mini-ITX box with 256MB PC133
SDRAM). It was definitely much less responsive, but still not that bad.
And considering the server was also running email/printers/web
server/Oracle database, I think it shows that Slimserver doesn't need
lots of horsepower.


-- 
cliveb
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to