So I ran some timings and I was quite surprised: Standard my.tt
Directory Scan (19021 of 19021) Complete 00:51:48 Playlist Scan (10 of 10) Complete 00:00:05 Merge Various Artists (1870 of 1870) Complete 00:01:31 Artwork Scan (1966 of 1966) Complete 00:37:08 Total Time: 01:30:32 (Thu, 10. Dec 2009 / 10:39:08) Using moonbase's my.tt but with innodb_buffer_pool_size = 128M Directory Scan (19021 of 19021) Complete 00:52:53 Playlist Scan (10 of 10) Complete 00:00:06 Merge Various Artists (1870 of 1870) Complete 00:01:35 Artwork Scan (1966 of 1966) Complete 00:36:04 Total Time: 01:30:38 (Thu, 10. Dec 2009 / 1:08:14) So no significant difference (to the accuracy of the benchmark) I also made some measurements of response times in the web ui and, to the accuracy of my second counting, I couldn't spot any differences. It still "felt" faster but maybe that's placebo. I also tried moonbase's my.tt unchanged but not for a scan. Again no measurable improvements to the webui. So, I think it helps, but the numbers don't back me up. Double blind testing anyone :-) -- bstrulo ------------------------------------------------------------------------ bstrulo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15997 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=70371 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
